Re: Postgres chooses slow query plan from time to time

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kristjan Mustkivi <sonicmonkey(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pgsql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres chooses slow query plan from time to time
Date: 2021-09-13 19:21:39
Message-ID: CAMkU=1x_9g7BZrPwpaVhwvVe7DKTR9gTgGLCtyVQq_m0iBGvRw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 9:25 AM Kristjan Mustkivi <sonicmonkey(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> SELECT
> *
> FROM
> myschema.mytable pbh
> WHERE
> pbh.product_code = $1
> AND pbh.cage_player_id = $2
> AND pbh.cage_code = $3
> AND balance_type = $4
> AND pbh.modified_time < $5
> ORDER BY
> pbh.modified_time DESC FETCH FIRST 1 ROWS ONLY;
>

> "mytable_idx2" btree (cage_code, cage_player_id, modified_time)
>

Why does this index exist? It seems rather specialized, but what is it
specialized for?

If you are into specialized indexes, the ideal index for this query would
be:

btree (cage_code, cage_player_id, product_code, balance_type, modified_time)

But the first 4 columns can appear in any order if that helps you
combine indexes. If this index existed, then it wouldn't have to choose
between two other suboptimal indexes, and so would be unlikely to choose
incorrectly between them.

Cheers,

Jeff

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2021-09-13 19:39:05 Re: Postgres chooses slow query plan from time to time
Previous Message ldh@laurent-hasson.com 2021-09-13 15:53:33 RE: Big Performance drop of Exceptions in UDFs between V11.2 and 13.4