Re: Parallel Query

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Luís Roberto Weck <luisroberto(at)siscobra(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Parallel Query
Date: 2019-11-13 22:08:15
Message-ID: CAMkU=1x6Zzpi4W2gjdf3uMyM3C2DH+7NizQp8LO6NWu_iY1eEQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:59 PM Luís Roberto Weck <
luisroberto(at)siscobra(dot)com(dot)br> wrote:

>
>
> Indeed, reducing the costs made the query run in parallel, but the
> improvement in speed was not worth the cost (CPU).
>

Could you show the plan for that?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2019-11-13 22:21:26 Re: Parallel Query
Previous Message Luís Roberto Weck 2019-11-13 21:07:16 Re: Parallel Query