| From: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | AI Rumman <rummandba(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: what should be the best autovacuum configuration for daily partition table |
| Date: | 2014-05-14 19:45:23 |
| Message-ID: | CAMkU=1wJ+JGQ4kc5W9vxYcfU11UGmAQspKVgDC+0MVK236KBWQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:06 AM, AI Rumman <rummandba(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a table with daily partition setup where old partitions are static
> tables that is after each day we don't get any new data in old partitions.
> The database size is 2 TB and I am running with autovacuum on for
> Postgresql 8.4.
> Now, I am facing a problem where old tables are not being vacuumed by
> autovacuum deamon and every now and then we are seeing autovacuum to
> prevent wrap around in the database and age(datfrozenzid) gets high for the
> database.
> Any idea what should be best configuration for this type of database
> environment.
>
How high is age(datfrozenxid) getting? What is the problem you are
experiencing?
Cheers,
Jeff
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Keith | 2014-05-15 03:27:11 | Re: what should be the best autovacuum configuration for daily partition table |
| Previous Message | chiru r | 2014-05-14 19:33:27 | Re: what should be the best autovacuum configuration for daily partition table |