From: | Frank Alberto Rodriguez Solana <franknigth(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Christian Henz <c(dot)henz(at)software-vision(dot)eu> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Forks of pgadmin3? |
Date: | 2019-03-22 23:21:17 |
Message-ID: | CAMj3sNKBiTOy_e0UkGapd4vWNkBEJ9cf4cv2vfx8A4oMwpaM2g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
You could try OmniDB, is web app but have a version that just feels like a
desktop application. Is supported by 2ndQuadrant.
This is the official website https://omnidb.org/en/
Greetings
El vie., 22 mar. 2019 a las 4:56, Christian Henz (<c(dot)henz(at)software-vision(dot)eu>)
escribió:
> I know I'm late to the party, but we're only now migrating from
> Postgres 9.x, realizing that pgadmin3 does not support Postgres 11.
>
> I have checked out pgadmin4, but I don't like it at all. My colleagues
> feel the same way, and some web searching suggests that we are not
> alone.
>
> So I wonder if there are any active forks of pgadmin3?
>
> I found some on Github with some significant changes that I assume
> were done by people working for VK, the Russian social network. These
> appear to be personal hacks though (monosyllabic commit messages, build
> scripts added with hard coded local paths etc.).
>
> There are also the Debian packages that have patches adding Postgres
> 10 support among other things. Not sure if there would be interest
> there in continuing to support newer Postgres versions.
>
> Are there other, more organized efforts to continue pgadmin3?
>
> Are there technical reasons why such a continuation would not make
> sense?
>
> Cheers,
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Henz
> Software Developer, software & vision Sarrazin GmbH & Co. KG
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2019-03-23 00:36:55 | Re: Forks of pgadmin3? |
Previous Message | Peter J. Holzer | 2019-03-22 19:55:26 | Re: Script which shows performance of ByteA: ascii vs binary |