Re: Use LIMIT instead of Unique for DISTINCT when all distinct pathkeys are redundant

From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Use LIMIT instead of Unique for DISTINCT when all distinct pathkeys are redundant
Date: 2022-10-14 02:14:55
Message-ID: CAMbWs49M5oemdZ5n33qvyWzUzexz=Z305Z01JdBNJzEPqDto0Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 6:43 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 at 21:17, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 2:48 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >> To stop the planner from adding that final sort, I opted to hack the
> >> LimitPath's pathkeys to say that it's already sorted by the
> >> PlannerInfo's sort_pathkeys. That feels slightly icky, but it does
> >> seem a little wasteful to initialise a sort node on every execution of
> >> the plan to sort a single tuple.
> >
> >
> > I don't get how this plan comes out. It seems not correct because Limit
> > node above an unsorted path would give us an unpredictable row.
>
> Actually, you're right. That manual setting of the pathkeys is an
> unneeded remanent from a bug I fixed before sending out v2. It can
> just be removed.
>
> I've attached the v3 patch.

The v3 patch looks good to me.

Thanks
Richard

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2022-10-14 02:15:58 Re: GUC values - recommended way to declare the C variables?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-10-14 02:00:10 Re: Support tls-exporter as channel binding for TLSv1.3