From: | Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Converting SetOp to read its two inputs separately |
Date: | 2024-11-14 09:32:57 |
Message-ID: | CAMbWs492vMy3XNjDZRtqtHfFTK6HVeDwhrEQH7eXGgF_h5Jnzw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 6:28 PM Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 1. We need to teach set_operation_ordered_results_useful() that sorted
> input paths are also useful for INTERSECT/EXCEPT, so that we can have
> setop_pathkeys set for the subqueries.
BTW, I noticed a typo in the comment for function
set_operation_ordered_results_useful().
* set_operation_ordered_results_useful
* Return true if the given SetOperationStmt can be executed by utilizing
* paths that provide sorted input according to the setop's targetlist.
- * Returns false when sorted paths are not any more useful then unsorted
+ * Returns false when sorted paths are not any more useful than unsorted
* ones.
Thanks
Richard
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2024-11-14 09:46:05 | Re: Virtual generated columns |
Previous Message | Richard Guo | 2024-11-14 09:28:17 | Re: Converting SetOp to read its two inputs separately |