Re: Converting SetOp to read its two inputs separately

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Converting SetOp to read its two inputs separately
Date: 2024-11-29 03:02:01
Message-ID: CAApHDvpyU5LOWxTMdY2ZQrcgU8KS=6M1SQBGSnyya8f+jr1dRQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 at 22:33, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> BTW, I noticed a typo in the comment for function

> - * Returns false when sorted paths are not any more useful then unsorted
> + * Returns false when sorted paths are not any more useful than unsorted

I pushed a fix for that.

Thanks.

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kirill Reshke 2024-11-29 03:55:03 Re: Using read stream in autoprewarm
Previous Message David Rowley 2024-11-29 02:39:03 Re: Remove useless GROUP BY columns considering unique index