From: | Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Christensen <david+pg(at)pgguru(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Reuse child_relids in try_partitionwise_join was Re: Assert failure on bms_equal(child_joinrel->relids, child_joinrelids) |
Date: | 2024-07-23 08:35:44 |
Message-ID: | CAMbWs4-wtWa5KkmWXHw1ZdkHjiUdFBiK6UW5zF59yY-bXoVVEA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 3:48 PM Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> This is different. But it needs a rebase. PFA rebased patch. The revised commit message explains the change better.
I looked through this patch and I think it is in a good shape.
Some minor comments:
* I think it's better to declare 'child_relids' as type Relids
rather than Bitmapset *. While they are the same thing, Bitmapset *
isn't typically used in joinrels.c. And I doubt that it is necessary
to explicitly initialize it to NULL.
* This patch changes the signature of function build_child_join_rel().
I recommend arranging the two newly added parameters as 'int
nappinfos, AppendRelInfo **appinfos' to maintain consistency with
other functions that include these parameters.
* At the end of the for loop in try_partitionwise_join(), we attempt
to free the variables used within the loop. I suggest freeing these
variables in the order or reverse order of their allocation, rather
than arbitrarily. Also, in non-partitionwise-join planning, we do not
free local variables in this manner. I understand that we do this for
partitionwise-join because accumulating local variables can lead to
significant memory usage, particularly with many partitions. I think
it would be beneficial to add a comment in try_partitionwise_join()
explaining this behavior.
Thanks
Richard
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-07-23 08:37:36 | Re: Document use of ldapurl with LDAP simple bind |
Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2024-07-23 07:11:42 | Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates |