| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Document use of ldapurl with LDAP simple bind |
| Date: | 2024-07-23 08:37:36 |
| Message-ID: | 06b44ab0-8079-4f03-8d67-e7d2c9a9dad9@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08.07.24 23:27, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 12:11 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>> This appears to imply that specifying ldapurl is only applicable for
>> search+bind. Maybe that whole message should be simplified to something
>> like
>>
>> "configuration mixes arguments for simple bind and search+bind"
>>
>> (The old wording also ignores that the error might arise via "ldapsuffix".)
>
> I kept the imperative "cannot" and tried to match the terminology with
> our documentation at [1]:
>
> cannot mix options for simple bind and search+bind modes
Committed.
(I suppose this could be considered a bug fix, but I don't feel an
urgency to go backpatching this. Let me know if there are different
opinions.)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-07-23 09:01:44 | Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15) |
| Previous Message | Richard Guo | 2024-07-23 08:35:44 | Re: Reuse child_relids in try_partitionwise_join was Re: Assert failure on bms_equal(child_joinrel->relids, child_joinrelids) |