| From: | Jeremy Finzel <finzelj(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ruben Rubio Rey <tk421(dot)1(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Geographical multi-master replication |
| Date: | 2019-01-25 05:10:16 |
| Message-ID: | CAMa1XUi8YnQu9acWf8xtSvLy_Act9bZ4YOV0nGX_68YDx-LRZA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
>
> The problem is that the version for BDR 1.0.7, which has an implementation
> for postgres 9.4, will be on end of live at the end of this year.
> Unfortunately the paid solution is out of our budget, so we currently have
> two options: find an alternative or remove the multi-region implementation.
> We are currently looking for alternatives.
>
You are missing all of the alternatives here. Why don't you consider
upgrading from postgres 9.4 and with it to a supported version of BDR?
There is nothing better you can do to keep your infrastructure up to date,
performant, secure, and actually meet your multi-master needs than to
upgrade to a newer version of postgres which does have BDR support.
Even "stock" postgres 9.4 is set for end of life soon. Upgrade!
Thanks,
Jeremy
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Steele | 2019-01-25 05:22:05 | Re: [pgbackrest] Expiring the last backup? |
| Previous Message | Kaushal Shriyan | 2019-01-25 02:41:48 | Re: Recommended Hardware requirements for PostgreSQL DB Server. |