From: | Jeremy Finzel <finzelj(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ruben Rubio Rey <tk421(dot)1(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Geographical multi-master replication |
Date: | 2019-01-28 21:47:58 |
Message-ID: | CAMa1XUhDgggWO1F=hOAV9AF8MygNSkJF+S2ha1K9Hhv0y097Qw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ruben Rubio Rey <tk421(dot)1(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> > Why don't you consider upgrading from postgres 9.4 and with it to a
> supported version of BDR? There is nothing better you can do to keep your
> infrastructure up to date, performant, secure, and actually meet your
> multi-master needs than to upgrade to a newer version of postgres which
> does have BDR support.
>
> This is something that we have definitely thought of. That would be a good
> alternative but I have an strong feeling that the business won't be willing
> to pay for it. The cost of the paid BDR version, in comparison with the
> current fixed expenses of the infrastructure, are just too large. That's
> why we are researching alternatives.
>
When I said “supported version” of BDR, I mostly meant a newer version of
Postgres. I know you have to decide on getting support BDR but regardless
of what route you take, part of your plan needs to be > 9.4 :).
Thanks,
Jeremy
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ruben Rubio Rey | 2019-01-28 23:29:02 | Re: Geographical multi-master replication |
Previous Message | Ruben Rubio Rey | 2019-01-28 21:32:21 | Re: Geographical multi-master replication |