Re: Geographical multi-master replication

> When I said “supported version” of BDR, I mostly meant a newer version of
Postgres. I know you have to decide on getting support BDR but regardless
of what route you take, part of your plan needs to be > 9.4 :).

I agree with you. We will be upgrading to the latest postgres version.

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:48 AM Jeremy Finzel <finzelj(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ruben Rubio Rey <tk421(dot)1(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jeremy,
>>
>> > Why don't you consider upgrading from postgres 9.4 and with it to a
>> supported version of BDR? There is nothing better you can do to keep your
>> infrastructure up to date, performant, secure, and actually meet your
>> multi-master needs than to upgrade to a newer version of postgres which
>> does have BDR support.
>>
>> This is something that we have definitely thought of. That would be a
>> good alternative but I have an strong feeling that the business won't be
>> willing to pay for it. The cost of the paid BDR version, in comparison with
>> the current fixed expenses of the infrastructure, are just too large.
>> That's why we are researching alternatives.
>>
>
> When I said “supported version” of BDR, I mostly meant a newer version of
> Postgres. I know you have to decide on getting support BDR but regardless
> of what route you take, part of your plan needs to be > 9.4 :).
>
> Thanks,
> Jeremy
>