Re: Let's make PostgreSQL multi-threaded

From: Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Let's make PostgreSQL multi-threaded
Date: 2023-06-08 10:04:05
Message-ID: CAMT0RQTC8ku23ZfmgkmLQ8GGMAirnU547Lp9dofn-t-BWs18xQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 12:09 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
...

> We could e.g. eventually decide that we
> don't support parallel query without threading support - which would allow us
> to get rid of a very significant amount of code and runtime overhead.

Here I was hoping to go in the opposite direction and support parallel
query across replicas.

This looks much more doable based on the process model than the single
process / multiple threads model.

---
Cheers
Hannu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joel Jacobson 2023-06-08 10:05:44 [btree-indexed column] <@ [range | multirange]
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2023-06-08 09:56:37 Re: Let's make PostgreSQL multi-threaded