| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Let's make PostgreSQL multi-threaded |
| Date: | 2023-06-08 13:38:16 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYfYX6qyxN7O1zhfj+KagSADpo5AhObj3ghPAo-XA2Zrw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 6:04 AM Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com> wrote:
> Here I was hoping to go in the opposite direction and support parallel
> query across replicas.
>
> This looks much more doable based on the process model than the single
> process / multiple threads model.
I don't think this is any more or less difficult to support in one
model vs. the other. The problems seem pretty much unrelated.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Juan José Santamaría Flecha | 2023-06-08 13:45:33 | Re: Inconsistent results with libc sorting on Windows |
| Previous Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2023-06-08 13:27:47 | Re: Named Prepared statement problems and possible solutions |