badly scaling performance with appending to bytea

From: Gary Cowell <gary(dot)cowell(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: badly scaling performance with appending to bytea
Date: 2018-03-21 12:03:17
Message-ID: CAMC0u8kSE3_tmNQqMWj-1oGc0m_aWyjGNXWNWXbtO1hTJHp=jw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

We are trying to implement postgresql code to load a large object into
a postgresql bytea in chunks to avoid loading the file into memory in
the client.

First attempt was to do

update build_attachment set chunk = chunk || newdata ;

this did not scale and got significantly slower after 4000-5000 updates.

The chunks are 4K in size, and I'm testing with a 128MB input file,
requiring 32,774 chunk updates.

Next, I tried creating an aggregate, thus:

(taken from stackoverflow)

CREATE AGGREGATE bytea_agg(bytea) (SFUNC=byteacat,STYPE=bytea);

changed the code to insert the chunks to a temporary table :

create temporary table build_attachment (seq bigserial primary key,
chunk bytea ) on commit drop;

we then insert our 4K chunks to this, which takes very little time (20
seconds for the 32,774 inserts)

Here's an example though of trying to select the aggregate:

gary=> \timing
Timing is on.
gary=> select bytea_agg(chunk order by seq) from build_attachment
where seq < 4000 \g output
Time: 13372.843 ms
gary=> select bytea_agg(chunk order by seq) from build_attachment
where seq < 8000 \g output
Time: 54447.541 ms
gary=> select bytea_agg(chunk order by seq) from build_attachment
where seq < 16000 \g output
Time: 582219.773 ms

So those partial aggregates completed in somewhat acceptable times but ...

gary=> select bytea_agg(chunk order by seq) from build_attachment
where seq < 32000 \g output
this one hadn't completed in an hour - the PostgreSQL connection
process for my connection on the server goes to 100% CPU and stays
there, not using much RAM, not doing much IO, oddly

EXPLAINing these aggregate selects doesn't show anything useful.

Am I doomed to not be able to update a bytea this way? Is there some
way I can tune this?

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rick Otten 2018-03-21 12:12:31 Re: badly scaling performance with appending to bytea
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2018-03-21 05:24:16 Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables