Re: PG version recommendation

>>Home-rolled application, or third party?
Are you asking about how they do VMs ?
They already provide PG v9.6.7 , so I gather they're not averse to
supporting PG DBs.

On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 4:05 PM Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On 5/7/19 1:52 PM, David Gauthier wrote:
>
> Hi:
>
> I'm going to be requesting a PG instance supported by an IT team in a
> large corp. They will be creating the server as a VM. We will be loading
> the DB using scripts (perl/dbi) on linux, possibly using bulk loading
> techniques if that's required. Queries will come from both linux and the
> web, but typically the number of concurrent users will be on the order of
> 10 reads, maybe a couple writers. < 1T total disk, no partitioning. I
> will be requesting PITR.
>
> I need to pick a PG version in my request. I want something that will be
> stable and reliable while, of course, being able to perform well. What
> would be a good choice for PG version ?
>
> Also, since the server will be a VM, are there any special
> recommendations/suggestions might I forward in the request (install
> options, tuning options, other) ?
>
>
> Home-rolled application, or third party? If third party, they'll have
> something to say about supported version numbers.
>
>
> --
> Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
>