Re: PG version recommendation

No, I'm asking about the application.

On 5/7/19 3:51 PM, David Gauthier wrote:
> >>Home-rolled application, or third party?
> Are you asking about how they do VMs ?
> They already provide PG v9.6.7 , so I gather they're not averse to
> supporting PG DBs.
>
>
> On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 4:05 PM Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com
> <mailto:ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> On 5/7/19 1:52 PM, David Gauthier wrote:
>> Hi:
>>
>> I'm going to be requesting a PG instance supported by an IT team in a
>> large corp.  They will be creating the server as a VM.  We will be
>> loading the DB using scripts (perl/dbi) on linux, possibly using bulk
>> loading techniques if that's required.  Queries will come from both
>> linux and the web, but typically the number of concurrent users will
>> be on the order of 10 reads, maybe a couple writers.  < 1T total
>> disk, no partitioning.  I will be requesting PITR.
>>
>> I need to pick a PG version in my request.  I want something that
>> will be stable and reliable while, of course, being able to perform
>> well.  What would be a good choice for PG version ?
>>
>> Also, since the server will be a VM, are there any special
>> recommendations/suggestions might I forward in the request (install
>> options, tuning options, other) ?
>
> Home-rolled application, or third party?  If third party, they'll have
> something to say about supported version numbers.
>
>
> --
> Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
>

--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.