Re: Re : [BUG #4943]

From: Aditya Toshniwal <aditya(dot)toshniwal(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Karan Takalkar <karan1533os(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re : [BUG #4943]
Date: 2019-12-11 12:11:03
Message-ID: CAM9w-_k5AKhwGM7OT74DwVYUJrq1vLv+-jdqtnBTDLO1MEWw2Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Hi,

I've updated your patch further to escape the info prefix so that it
doesn't break if db name is something like - "<script>alert(1)</script>".
Fixed a pep8 issue.
Otherwise, the patch looks good to me and test cases works fine.

On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 5:19 PM Karan Takalkar <karan1533os(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have updated the disconnect messages.
> Databases/extension tests are failing , i have attached the log below.
> They are also failing if i undo the modifications.
> i do not know if this a problem with my setup or i maybe not following a
> convention.
> Please check the updated patch.
>
> Regards,
> Karan
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 3:03 PM Aditya Toshniwal <
> aditya(dot)toshniwal(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Karan,
>>
>> I've updated your patch a bit. Kindly test and share the logs if test
>> cases fail.
>> Test cases seems to be working fine for me. Kindly also change
>> disconnected messages.
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 6:51 PM Karan Takalkar <karan1533os(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> "add more variables to the response along with info and use those in the
>>> front end"
>>> i have already implemented that , but am still failing (7) test cases
>>> particularly in the databases/extensions tests(5).
>>> i had run regression tests for browser node.(and all it's sub
>>> directories).
>>> Please check the patch attached.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 6:34 PM Aditya Toshniwal <
>>> aditya(dot)toshniwal(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> [please use reply all to reply]
>>>>
>>>> You can add more variables to the response along with info and use
>>>> those in the front end.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019, 18:24 Karan Takalkar <karan1533os(at)gmail(dot)com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> I had been naively modifying jason response of connect function in
>>>>> databases __init__.py, later realized there are a lot of dependencies on it
>>>>> and most of regression tests use:
>>>>> if db_con["info"] == "Database connected.": .
>>>>>
>>>>> I am now modifying the Alertify.success script* directly responsible
>>>>> for the popup, i could append the database name in the message but am
>>>>> having trouble finding the *variable to supply server name.*
>>>>> The file and location of function is :
>>>>> *
>>>>> (web/pgadmin/browser/server_groups/servers/databases/static/js/database.js
>>>>> line 523)
>>>>>
>>>>> the message should be:
>>>>> Alertify.success("(?server_name_variable?}+'/'+data.label+' - '+
>>>>> res.info")
>>>>>
>>>>> data.label contains database name
>>>>> res.info is the jason response coming from databases __init__.py
>>>>> connect function ; which is "Database connected."
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 8:35 PM Aditya Toshniwal <
>>>>> aditya(dot)toshniwal(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Karan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kindly add a hyphen between the message and names, create a patch to
>>>>>> pgAdmin hackers(check cc).
>>>>>> Kindly also run the test cases and pep8 before sending.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019, 20:17 Karan Takalkar <karan1533os(at)gmail(dot)com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have updated the success message.
>>>>>>> Please check the screenshots attached.
>>>>>>> Should i make a patch?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Karan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 9 Dec, 2019, 3:25 PM Aditya Toshniwal, <
>>>>>>> aditya(dot)toshniwal(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ++pgadmin-hackers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Karan,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is good to know that you're contributing.
>>>>>>>> I would suggest {server name}/{db name} as name instead of did is
>>>>>>>> better for UX. You can get the db name from conn object and server name
>>>>>>>> using the sid (refer
>>>>>>>> - web/pgadmin/browser/server_groups/servers/__init__.py)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 3:11 PM Karan Takalkar <
>>>>>>>> karan1533os(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have been working on #4943 ("Database connected" success
>>>>>>>>> message itself is not enough) added by you on pgAdmin4 issues.
>>>>>>>>> I want to know what details of database should be included in
>>>>>>>>> success message.(i have added 'did')
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The success message can be modified by altering json response in
>>>>>>>>> the connect method in file
>>>>>>>>> PGADMIN_SRC/web/pgadmin/browser/server_groups/servers/databases/__init__.py.
>>>>>>>>> please have a look at the screenshots attached.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> original:
>>>>>>>>> info=_( "Database connected.")
>>>>>>>>> new:
>>>>>>>>> info=_("Postgres version/{0} Database connected.".format(did))
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Karan
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>>>>>>> Aditya Toshniwal
>>>>>>>> Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune
>>>>>>>> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks and Regards,
>> Aditya Toshniwal
>> Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune
>> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"
>>
>

--
Thanks and Regards,
Aditya Toshniwal
Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune
"Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"

Attachment Content-Type Size
BUG_4943_updated_v3.patch application/octet-stream 3.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Akshay Joshi 2019-12-12 05:42:29 pgAdmin 4 commit: Added more information to the 'Database connected/dis
Previous Message Karan Takalkar 2019-12-11 11:49:02 Re: Re : [BUG #4943]