From: | Surinder Kumar <surinder(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: RM1840 - cannot create gist index due to enforced ASC, DESC options in generated SQL |
Date: | 2017-01-17 09:52:01 |
Message-ID: | CAM5-9D_EPCFv4kYs_qaXpBNyDRQhANDCz+kgYikyf7-Xathg4w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Hi
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Surinder Kumar
> <surinder(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Please find updated patch following changes:
> > 1) Keep field 'opclass' combo box enabled.
>
> That doesn't seem to be working.
Is the field 'opclass' is not enabled for you?.
Can you please tell in which scenario it doesn't gets enabled? so that I
can fix it.
>
> > 2) Keep ASC/DESC and NULLs FIRST/LAST options disable for access methods
> > other than 'btree'.
> > 3) Add validation for name field.
>
> Those bits do though :-)
>
> Please fix 1).
>
> Thanks!
>
> > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Surinder Kumar
> >> <surinder(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >> > Hi
> >> >
> >> > Please find updated patch with change.
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Surinder Kumar
> >> >> <surinder(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >> >> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Hi
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Surinder Kumar
> >> >> >> <surinder(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >> >> >> > Hi
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > This fix is for exclusion constraint.
> >> >> >> > The options like "order" and "nulls" must be conditional. i.e.
> >> >> >> > include
> >> >> >> > only
> >> >> >> > when access method type is other than "gist".
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> When creating an index, the asc/desc options are disabled if
> >> >> >> gist/gin
> >> >> >> used. I think they also should be here.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Also, what about gin indexes in this case?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > As per documentation,
> >> >> > The access method must support amgettuple (see Chapter 52); at
> >> >> > present
> >> >> > this
> >> >> > means GIN cannot be used
> >> >>
> >> >> OK, but this patch (unlike the last one) only seems to check for
> gist.
> >> >
> >> > I have modified the code so It will check for 'gist' and 'spgist'
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This still doesn't seem right to me. For example, if I choose an
> >> access method that doesn't have a default operator class for the
> >> selected data type, Postgres asks me to explicitly choose one, which I
> >> now can't because the combo box is disabled. Conversely, whilst the
> >> opclass should probably not be disabled, the ASC/DESC and NULLs
> >> FIRST/LAST options probably should be disabled (right now, they're
> >> just ignored).
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Dave Page
> >> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> >> Twitter: @pgsnake
> >>
> >> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> >> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fahar Abbas | 2017-01-17 10:02:30 | Re: PATCH: RM# 1679 - Background process for "restore" not reporting status back to pgAdmin |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2017-01-17 09:46:10 | Re: PATCH: RM# 1679 - Background process for "restore" not reporting status back to pgAdmin |