From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: GSoC proposal - "make an unlogged table logged" |
Date: | 2014-03-03 20:44:26 |
Message-ID: | CAM3SWZTnStjOJpCZFskOAQ5oeBPd78znx0qk_QC4wXahJf_aCA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
<fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Is the TODO item "make an unlogged table logged" [1] a good GSoC project?
Another interesting project around unlogged tables would be to make it
possible to have unlogged indexes on fully-logged tables. That is
something that there was some discussion of before, that might be
easier.
FWIW, I don't think that TODO page is a very good resource for finding
a starter project. Picking a good project is a skill in and of itself.
A lot of that stuff is aspirational, either because it's difficult,
or, more often, because it's difficult relative to the rewards, which
can be quite low. To be honest, if I have what I imagine to be a great
idea for a project, I don't put it on that page. Maybe I should, but I
don't, and I don't think that is uncommon. This is not because I'm
particularly guarded about sharing the information.
Why do you think that hash indexes still aren't WAL-logged after all
these years (a project that someone made noise about recently in
relation to GSoC), even though that's generally considered to be a
SMOP?
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-03-03 20:47:21 | Re: GSoC proposal - "make an unlogged table logged" |
Previous Message | Gavin Flower | 2014-03-03 19:23:19 | Re: jsonb and nested hstore |