| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: GSoC proposal - "make an unlogged table logged" |
| Date: | 2014-03-03 20:47:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20140303204721.GF17253@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-03-03 12:44:26 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
> <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Is the TODO item "make an unlogged table logged" [1] a good GSoC project?
>
> Another interesting project around unlogged tables would be to make it
> possible to have unlogged indexes on fully-logged tables. That is
> something that there was some discussion of before, that might be
> easier.
I'd actually say it's harder because it requires modifying the catalog
or transparently introducing hacks similar to what unlogged matviews are
doing, to make sure the index is marked invalid after a crash restart.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2014-03-03 21:18:20 | Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-03-03 20:44:26 | Re: GSoC proposal - "make an unlogged table logged" |