Re: nodes/*funcs.c inconsistencies

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: nodes/*funcs.c inconsistencies
Date: 2015-08-02 22:07:34
Message-ID: CAM3SWZT_Ugujtcmn+Zq97u5GPcdL1UGMEQxoUKaxZE46-eAtDA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> A fresh audit found the attached problems new in 9.5[1]. Most are cosmetic
> INT/UINT or field order corrections.

I was responsible for a couple of the cosmetic ones. Sorry about that.

It occurs to me that we could do a little more to prevent this
automatically. Couldn't we adopt
AssertVariableIsOfType()/AssertVariableIsOfTypeMacro() to macros like
READ_UINT_FIELD()?

I'm surprised that this stuff was only ever used for logical decoding
infrastructure so far.
--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-08-02 22:18:02 Re: nodes/*funcs.c inconsistencies
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-08-02 21:37:42 Re: nodes/*funcs.c inconsistencies