Re: autovacuum_work_mem

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: autovacuum_work_mem
Date: 2013-11-15 23:23:58
Message-ID: CAM3SWZTWTpbu=q+9enW5S8Wa_E3wEsRNMZNqo5DuhBotOo_H4g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> +1. If changing at all, then maybe just "autovacuum_mem"?

I would like to stick with autovacuum_work_mem - it reflects the fact
that it's a setting shadowed by maintenance_work_mem, without being
too verbose.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2013-11-15 23:27:18 Re: Extra functionality to createuser
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2013-11-15 23:15:21 Re: additional json functionality