Re: log_checkpoints, microseconds

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: log_checkpoints, microseconds
Date: 2014-04-10 19:43:54
Message-ID: CAM3SWZTJQK0tBEMTqetyOHAe50fnD56S3Lmr=NQRzy2pjF7E+g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I think you're both wrong. 1000 usec = 1 msec, not the other way round.

Yes, but why would you ever want to divide any number of microseconds
by 1000 like this, unless you were actually interested in nanoseconds?
The point is that we start out with microseconds "elapsed" here, not
milliseconds or seconds.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Flower 2014-04-10 19:56:35 Re: log_checkpoints, microseconds
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-04-10 19:20:15 Re: log_checkpoints, microseconds