| From: | Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: log_checkpoints, microseconds |
| Date: | 2014-04-10 19:56:35 |
| Message-ID: | 5346F773.4080101@archidevsys.co.nz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 11/04/14 07:43, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I think you're both wrong. 1000 usec = 1 msec, not the other way round.
> Yes, but why would you ever want to divide any number of microseconds
> by 1000 like this, unless you were actually interested in nanoseconds?
> The point is that we start out with microseconds "elapsed" here, not
> milliseconds or seconds.
>
>
123456 microseconds = 123.456 milliseconds
So to get milliseconds you divide the number of microseconds by 1000.
Cheers,
Gavin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2014-04-10 19:59:45 | Re: log_checkpoints, microseconds |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-04-10 19:43:54 | Re: log_checkpoints, microseconds |