| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Marc-Olaf Jaschke <marc-olaf(dot)jaschke(at)s24(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |
| Date: | 2016-03-23 17:58:41 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZSUwaPZ3fVTQaugDWucs4MJHBcYYWD726tiiQrwHaVE0g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Are you talking about configurable at./configure time, or guc?
I meant a GUC. I think a ./configure option is overkill.
What about the existing caller of strxfrm(), convert_string_datum()?
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-03-23 18:00:07 | Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2016-03-23 17:56:32 | Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-03-23 18:00:07 | Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2016-03-23 17:56:32 | Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |