From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Marc-Olaf Jaschke <marc-olaf(dot)jaschke(at)s24(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |
Date: | 2016-03-23 18:00:07 |
Message-ID: | CAM3SWZSQGbhyFZNjWNEsZRoZZFE=C_4+u7dswd4s+XKY_EWXTw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> What about the existing caller of strxfrm(), convert_string_datum()?
I mean, the caller exists in all back-branches, not just 9.5.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-03-23 18:02:32 | Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-03-23 17:58:41 | Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2016-03-23 18:01:25 | Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-03-23 17:58:41 | Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |