Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Marc-Olaf Jaschke <marc-olaf(dot)jaschke(at)s24(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Date: 2016-03-23 18:00:07
Message-ID: CAM3SWZSQGbhyFZNjWNEsZRoZZFE=C_4+u7dswd4s+XKY_EWXTw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> What about the existing caller of strxfrm(), convert_string_datum()?

I mean, the caller exists in all back-branches, not just 9.5.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-03-23 18:02:32 Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-03-23 17:58:41 Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2016-03-23 18:01:25 Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-03-23 17:58:41 Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)