| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.5 release notes |
| Date: | 2015-06-26 18:25:52 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZSQ_gMfs4Y8P5q_X+EiiGpL8DHBPdSLeicKAsD=2DStxQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Can you put your suggestions here in the form of a patch to the release notes?
The attached patch generalizes from the 9.2 release note wording. I
use the word "inlined" here too, even though commit 5ea86e6e6 did not
do too much with inlining of C code (unlike the 9.2 stuff that went in
a little after SortSupport itself).
Seems better to be consistent with the earlier item, and it is still
probably in some sense true, because the new SortSupport-wise inlined
comparator probably benefits from inlining more than the historic
scanKey-wise inlined comparator, due to the removal of indirection.
As I'm fond of pointing out, inlining is mostly useful as an "enabling
transformation" these days.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| release-note-sortsupport.patch | text/x-patch | 638 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-06-26 18:29:42 | Re: 9.5 release notes |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-06-26 18:21:55 | Re: 9.5 release notes |