From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.5 release notes |
Date: | 2015-06-26 18:29:42 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmobnViZg1AaUbmCn_01sPypYp4eek9LLDfGTLN3wb+SH1g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Can you put your suggestions here in the form of a patch to the release notes?
>
> The attached patch generalizes from the 9.2 release note wording. I
> use the word "inlined" here too, even though commit 5ea86e6e6 did not
> do too much with inlining of C code (unlike the 9.2 stuff that went in
> a little after SortSupport itself).
>
> Seems better to be consistent with the earlier item, and it is still
> probably in some sense true, because the new SortSupport-wise inlined
> comparator probably benefits from inlining more than the historic
> scanKey-wise inlined comparator, due to the removal of indirection.
OK, but how about this wording instead?
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml
index 4086c6b..5e8cc15 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml
@@ -221,6 +221,15 @@
<listitem>
<para>
+ Extend the infrastructure allow sorting to be performed by inlined,
+ non-<acronym>SQL</acronym>-callable comparison functions to cover
+ <command>CREATE INDEX</>, <command>REINDEX</>, and
+ <command>CLUSTER</> (Peter Geoghegan)
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
Improve in-memory hash performance (Tomas Vondra, Robert Haas)
</para>
</listitem>
BTW, shouldn't Andrew also be credited here, since he did the work on
datum sorts?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-06-26 18:32:35 | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-06-26 18:25:52 | Re: 9.5 release notes |