| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0 |
| Date: | 2015-04-25 02:21:37 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZRa7UnjGivnP1TuWH+XQBzZgN2VX4Ub2LmSggSMRErQrA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> Curious about what you think about my proposal to go back to putting
> the inference specification WHERE clause within the parenthesis, since
> this solves several problems, including clarifying to users that the
> predicate is part of the inference clause.
I've *provisionally* pushed code that goes back to the old way,
Andres: https://github.com/petergeoghegan/postgres/commit/2a5d80b27d2c5832ad26dde4651c64dd2004f401
Perhaps this is the least worst way, after all.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-04-25 04:39:04 | Re: Fwd: [GENERAL] 4B row limit for CLOB tables |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-04-25 00:59:26 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0 |