Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0
Date: 2015-04-25 00:59:26
Message-ID: 20150425005926.GA30322@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Peter Geoghegan (pg(at)heroku(dot)com) wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> > * Peter Geoghegan (pg(at)heroku(dot)com) wrote:
> >> I came up with something that is along the lines of what we discussed.
> >> I'll wait for you to push Dean's code, and rebase on top of that
> >> before submitting what I came up with. Maybe this can be rolled into
> >> my next revision if I work through Andres' most recent feedback
> >> without much delay.
> >
> > This is done (finally!). Please take a look and let me know if you have
> > any questions or concerns. Happy to chat again also, of course.
>
> Great, thanks.
>
> I didn't actually wait for you (as earlier indicated) before posting
> the new approach to RLS in V3.4. However, I have some decent tests for
> the new behaviors (I did test-driven development), so I think that
> when I rebase on top of the new RLS stuff tomorrow, I'll find that it
> won't be too difficult.

Fantastic, glad to hear it!

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-04-25 02:21:37 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-04-25 00:54:40 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0