Re: Stating the significance of Lehman & Yao in the nbtree README

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Stating the significance of Lehman & Yao in the nbtree README
Date: 2014-09-27 06:36:55
Message-ID: CAM3SWZR0EJpgo3TkTEErZBE7iSv2CF7rRLYf_K2ubvc+xaOtvg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I have observed that this patch is in 'Needs Review' state for
> next CF. Do you expect any further review from myside? I think
> we can use text recommended by Heikki and after that if you
> feel something more is still required, then you can update the same
> and send an updated patch. I believe it should be in 'Waiting On Author'
> state, please do let me know if you feel otherwise.

I don't think so. Thanks for the review!

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-09-27 07:16:19 Re: LIMIT for UPDATE and DELETE
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2014-09-27 06:34:28 Re: Stating the significance of Lehman & Yao in the nbtree README