Re: Stating the significance of Lehman & Yao in the nbtree README

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Stating the significance of Lehman & Yao in the nbtree README
Date: 2014-11-24 11:51:07
Message-ID: 54731BAB.3070200@vmware.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09/27/2014 09:36 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I have observed that this patch is in 'Needs Review' state for
>> next CF. Do you expect any further review from myside? I think
>> we can use text recommended by Heikki and after that if you
>> feel something more is still required, then you can update the same
>> and send an updated patch. I believe it should be in 'Waiting On Author'
>> state, please do let me know if you feel otherwise.
>
> I don't think so. Thanks for the review!

Ok, applied those extra paragraphs now, and marked as "committed" in the
commitfest.

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kouhei Kaigai 2014-11-24 11:57:43 Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API
Previous Message Jirayut Nimsaeng 2014-11-24 11:32:19 Re: BDR duplicate key value violates unique constraint error