| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Alpha2/Beta1 |
| Date: | 2015-07-22 04:02:27 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZQa2B_wv=Ovd8YfF5pL4yLTQK+DijiYF0rT+-4ZazXS-Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> I vote for alpha2. Comparing the "Open Issues" and "resolved after 9.5alpha1"
> sections of https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items, we've
> not transitioned to a qualitatively different level of API stability.
I agree. I'd hoped that my bugfixes would get committed in time for
what we were going to call Beta 1. Everyone qualified seems to be very
busy with other things that are more pressing.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-07-22 04:27:40 | Linux kernel performance regression tests and Postgres |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-07-22 03:57:17 | Re: Alpha2/Beta1 |