From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Alpha2/Beta1 |
Date: | 2015-07-22 03:57:17 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSP47V5akwmKiS+5reWToM=8Drc9iaVOfYzjZzg1hsXpg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 02:01:57PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> At the Developer's Meeting, we said we'd be releasing an alpha or beta
>> each month until final 9.5 release. As such, we should be releasing a
>> 9.5 alpha/beta in the first week of August.
>>
>> My question for Hackers is: should this be Alpha2 or Beta 1?
>
> I vote for alpha2. Comparing the "Open Issues" and "resolved after 9.5alpha1"
> sections of https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items, we've
> not transitioned to a qualitatively different level of API stability.
Mine goes for alpha2. There are some issues remaining yet that require
low-level attention.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-07-22 04:02:27 | Re: Alpha2/Beta1 |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-07-22 03:55:13 | Re: [HACKERS] object_classes array is broken, again |