Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ?

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Lætitia Avrot <laetitia(dot)avrot(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ryan Lambert <ryan(at)rustprooflabs(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, ahsan hadi <ahsan(dot)hadi(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ?
Date: 2022-03-24 22:38:15
Message-ID: CAM-w4HPRnHuunMoNANDrXgkk5GvPaeDPLXLk32D2zOC-YQfUTw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

It looks like this discussion has reached a bit of an impasse with Tom
being against this approach and Michael and Daniel being for it. It
doesn't look like it's going to get committed this commitfest, shall
we move it forward or mark it returned with feedback?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2022-03-24 22:38:44 Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-03-24 22:04:45 Re: Corruption during WAL replay