From: | Alicja Kucharczyk <zaledwie10minut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt(at)burggraben(dot)net> |
Cc: | Alexander Farber <alexander(dot)farber(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Azure Database for PostgreSQL flexible server vs other Azure offerings |
Date: | 2025-02-22 20:55:34 |
Message-ID: | CAM=sWa61a=dmnT2c-KMqpqXZXjRv3A6kwPv6BedFRiLTaxEcOA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Alex,
as Christoph already said go with Flexible Server, Single Server was
deprecated some time ago.
you don't need to worry about availability zones, AI or replication if you
don't want to use it. Just create a single instance in the region of choice
(availability zone will be automatically assigned) and try it out - there
is a free tier for a year to try it out.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/postgresql/flexible-server/how-to-deploy-on-azure-free-account
maybe you can add it to your PoC
there are no 3 options: "Azure Database for PostgreSQL" is just an umbrella
name, not a product, the product is "Azure Database for PostgreSQL -
Flexible Server". Basically it's just one for now.
regards,
Alicja
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tobias McNulty | 2025-02-23 01:57:52 | documentation question regarding REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY |
Previous Message | Christoph Moench-Tegeder | 2025-02-22 19:19:50 | Re: Azure Database for PostgreSQL flexible server vs other Azure offerings |