| From: | Perumal Raj <perucinci(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Luca Ferrari <fluca1978(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade : 9.X to 11.X issue CentoOS 7.6 |
| Date: | 2019-07-23 17:28:32 |
| Message-ID: | CALvqh4rs7125VUieF_X2kJkpCaSURERO6RZtTtEzih0JnK3mmw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Sorry i missed to refer link.
https://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/50135/pg-upgrade-unrecognized-configuration-parameter-unix-socket-directory
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 9:20 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Perumal Raj <perucinci(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Finally upgrade completed successfully after implementing the following
> > Workaround.
>
> You didn't say where you got these executables from, but if the 9.2 and 11
> packages were from the same packager, you should complain to them about
> it. If they're patching 9.2 to have unix_socket_directories, they should
> also patch pg_upgrade in later versions to understand that.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | PegoraroF10 | 2019-07-23 19:20:33 | Too slow to create new schema and their tables, functions, triggers. |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2019-07-23 17:23:40 | Re: Default ordering option |