Re: pg_upgrade : 9.X to 11.X issue CentoOS 7.6

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Perumal Raj <perucinci(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Luca Ferrari <fluca1978(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade : 9.X to 11.X issue CentoOS 7.6
Date: 2019-07-23 16:20:54
Message-ID: 4020.1563898854@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Perumal Raj <perucinci(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Finally upgrade completed successfully after implementing the following
> Workaround.

You didn't say where you got these executables from, but if the 9.2 and 11
packages were from the same packager, you should complain to them about
it. If they're patching 9.2 to have unix_socket_directories, they should
also patch pg_upgrade in later versions to understand that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Pyhalov 2019-07-23 16:28:52 LWLock optimization
Previous Message Perumal Raj 2019-07-23 16:03:54 Re: pg_upgrade : 9.X to 11.X issue CentoOS 7.6