Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?

From: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)protonmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Subject: Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?
Date: 2021-07-15 13:20:27
Message-ID: CALtqXTdJEXE3YR9ATVfR2ajmjyk3TsioA7q7wbYkxdcY6w_aGg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 4:54 PM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:

> On 4/8/21 7:40 PM, Paul A Jungwirth wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 7:22 AM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> >>
> >> Paul, you can submit to the next CF when you are ready with a new patch.
> >
> > Thanks David! I've made a lot of progress but still need to finish
> > support for CASCADE on temporal foreign keys. I've been swamped with
> > other things, but hopefully I can get something during this current
> > CF.
>
> The next CF starts on July 1 so you have some time.
>
> Regards,
> --
> -David
> david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

Based on last comments of Paul and David S I am changing the status to
"Waiting on Author".

--
Ibrar Ahmed

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Coleman 2021-07-15 13:44:14 Re: [PATCH] Use optimized single-datum tuplesort in ExecSort
Previous Message Ibrar Ahmed 2021-07-15 13:16:43 Re: Asymmetric partition-wise JOIN