| From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)protonmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges? |
| Date: | 2021-04-09 11:54:29 |
| Message-ID: | 65fba8b5-5256-151a-d37f-5c6855203449@pgmasters.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/8/21 7:40 PM, Paul A Jungwirth wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 7:22 AM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>>
>> Paul, you can submit to the next CF when you are ready with a new patch.
>
> Thanks David! I've made a lot of progress but still need to finish
> support for CASCADE on temporal foreign keys. I've been swamped with
> other things, but hopefully I can get something during this current
> CF.
The next CF starts on July 1 so you have some time.
Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Westermann (DWE) | 2021-04-09 12:11:35 | check_function_bodies: At least the description seems wrong, since we have prodedures |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-04-09 11:53:45 | Re: pgsql: autovacuum: handle analyze for partitioned tables |