| From: | Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Wooten <kdubb(at)me(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-jdbc <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgjdbc-ng |
| Date: | 2014-02-25 14:49:54 |
| Message-ID: | CALt0+o_WmM=DCKu0GQ5hGd4dahCoOOqCno5Sm63RsT4CThcBjA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Guillaume Smet
<guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Is PostgreSQL 9.2 a strong requirement or only necessary for advanced
> features?
Considering I have the following exception at startup:
[2014-02-25 15:44:27,711] ERROR - ConnectionPool - -
Unable to create initial connections of pool.
com.impossibl.postgres.jdbc.PGSQLSimpleException: Connection Error:
relation "pg_catalog.pg_range" does not exist
at com.impossibl.postgres.jdbc.ErrorUtils.makeSQLException(ErrorUtils.java:159)
at com.impossibl.postgres.jdbc.ConnectionUtil.createConnection(ConnectionUtil.java:181)
9.2 looks like a strong requirement.
Too bad.
--
Guillaume
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-02-25 15:01:20 | Re: pgjdbc-ng |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Smet | 2014-02-25 14:20:02 | Re: pgjdbc-ng |