Re: pgjdbc-ng

From: Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kevin Wooten <kdubb(at)me(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgjdbc-ng
Date: 2014-02-25 14:20:02
Message-ID: CALt0+o8_ScdRTfW50CjLoXS=qesBNZm__nZ4tGt-1jCVo9KMfQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Hi Kevin,

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:12 AM, Kevin Wooten <kdubb(at)me(dot)com> wrote:
> Just wanted to update everybody on the happenings with the "ng" driver...

Thanks for the heads up.

I will try it on the apps we currently have under development. They
are based on Hibernate 4.3.x and PostgreSQL 9.2.

Is PostgreSQL 9.2 a strong requirement or only necessary for advanced
features? Our biggest app is using 9.1 and it will probably stay that
way for quite a long time. As it's the most interesting app we have
here (complexity and load), I think it could be nice to see how it
goes with this app, too.

Thanks for your work.

--
Guillaume

In response to

  • pgjdbc-ng at 2014-02-25 00:12:49 from Kevin Wooten

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Smet 2014-02-25 14:49:54 Re: pgjdbc-ng
Previous Message Adib Saikali 2014-02-25 14:10:08 Re: JDBC Maven Checksum