From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: binary version of pg_current_wal_insert_lsn and pg_walfile_name functions |
Date: | 2022-09-23 00:35:36 |
Message-ID: | CALj2ACWG3FmvXvYLqC6vMj2poLAf0MxvLBoQ4iqoCc26za9a2w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 10:25 PM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> PFA that enhances pg_waldump to show the latest LSN and the
> corresponding WAL file when the -l or --lastLSN option is passed an
> argument to pg_waldump. Below is an example:
Thanks for the patch. I have some quick thoughts about it.
> When the user passes the '-l' command line option along with the data
> directory path to pg_waldump, it reads the control file from the data
> directory.
I don't think we need a new option for data directory -D. pg_waldump's
option 'p' can be used, please see the comments around
identify_target_directory().
> From the control file, it gets information like redo
> pointer and current timeline id.
Is there any reason for not using get_control_file() from
src/common/controldata_utils.c, but defining the exact same function
in pg_waldump.c?
> The redo pointer is considered to be
> the start pointer from where the pg_waldump starts reading wal data
> until end-of-wal to find the last LSN. For details please check the
> attached patch.
Making it dependent on the controlfile limits the usability of this
feature. Imagine, using this feature on an archive location or
pg_receivewal target directory where there are WAL files but no
controlfile. I think we can choose the appropriate combinations of
existing pg_waldump options, for instance, let users enter the start
WAL segment via startseg and/or start LSN via --start and the new
option for end WAL segment and end LSN.
> Please note that for compressed and .partial wal files this doesn't work.
Looking forward to the above capability because it expands the
usability of this feature.
--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2022-09-23 02:00:00 | Re: libpq error message refactoring |
Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2022-09-23 00:32:24 | Re: Refactor backup related code (was: Is it correct to say, "invalid data in file \"%s\"", BACKUP_LABEL_FILE in do_pg_backup_stop?) |