From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add pg_walinspect function with block info columns |
Date: | 2023-03-17 07:20:09 |
Message-ID: | CALj2ACVRK5=Z+2ZVsjgTTSkfEnQzCuwny7iigpG7g1btk4Ws2A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 7:33 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
>
> > IIUC, the concern raised so far in this thread is not just on the
> > performance of JOIN queries to get both block info and record level
> > info, but on ease of using pg_walinspect functions. If
> > pg_get_wal_block_info emits the record level information too (which
> > turns out to be 50 LOC more), one doesn't have to be expert at writing
> > JOIN queries or such, but just can run the function, which actually
> > takes way less time (3sec) to scan the same 5mn WAL records [3].
>
> That's exactly my concern, yes. As you say, it's not just the
> performance aspect. Requiring users to write a needlessly ornamental
> query is actively misleading. It suggests that block_ref is distinct
> information from the blocks output by pg_get_wal_block_info().
+1 for pg_get_wal_block_info emitting per-record WAL info too along
with block info, attached v2 patch does that. IMO, usability wins the
race here.
--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v2-0001-Emit-WAL-record-info-via-pg_get_wal_block_info.patch | application/octet-stream | 7.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Önder Kalacı | 2023-03-17 07:38:02 | Re: Dropped and generated columns might cause wrong data on subs when REPLICA IDENTITY FULL |
Previous Message | John Naylor | 2023-03-17 07:02:53 | Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum |