Re: OOM in spgist insert

From: Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OOM in spgist insert
Date: 2021-05-12 12:05:33
Message-ID: CALT9ZEExWfbzMAm=XMzvKLDz12u1a4dcgifeXzVDUj6F=o19rw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> INCLUDEd -> why you have used a mixed case here?
>
It is current practice to call INCLUDE columns in capital, you can find
many places in the current code. But case mixture can be avoided indeed ))
PFA v4

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-When-there-are-INCLUDEd-columns-in-SpGist-check-t.patch application/octet-stream 1.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2021-05-12 12:07:44 Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2021-05-12 11:56:33 Re: OOM in spgist insert