Re: Heartbleed Impact

From: Dev Kumkar <devdas(dot)kumkar(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Heartbleed Impact
Date: 2014-04-16 19:40:58
Message-ID: CALSLE1PAqV+BechM6dYaxMOSjEqQmfpem64ByWOVuzsG6jgh6g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:53 AM, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> wrote:

> windows native stuff uses completely different TLS libraries, SChannel and
> stuff. AFAIK, these aren't subject to this bug, which was specific to
> OpenSSL 1.0.1x for x=a-f... openssl is only used on windows when someone
> uses it explicitly, such as in Cygwin applications, and such.
>
> It *is* used by postgresql under windows as enterpriseDB builds it, since
> PG was written to use openssl in the first place.
>
> --
> john r pierce 37N 122W
> somewhere on the middle of the left coast

So does this mean PostgreSQL binaries available on EnterpriseDB has an
impact for windows ?
Can you help me with the binary name?

Regards...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message yhe 2014-04-16 19:52:36 hot standby data folder bigger than primary
Previous Message John R Pierce 2014-04-16 19:23:11 Re: Heartbleed Impact