From: | Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: freeing LDAPMessage in CheckLDAPAuth |
Date: | 2022-09-04 13:52:37 |
Message-ID: | CALNJ-vR=MLc5XnrSp1JOM0B2+YyS8OseP9zZ-R7SHc8_85P5NQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Sep 4, 2022 at 3:58 AM Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2022 at 12:25 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 01:52:10AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> > I can't get too excited about this. All of the error exit paths in
>> > backend authentication code will lead immediately to process exit, so
>> > the possibility of some memory being leaked really has no consequences
>> > worth worrying about. If we *were* worried about it, sprinkling a few
>> > more ldap_msgfree() calls into the existing code would hardly make it
>> > more bulletproof.
>>
>> Even if this is not critical in the backend for this authentication
>> path, I'd like to think that it is still a good practice for future
>> code so as anything code-pasted around would get the call. So I see
>> no reason to not put smth on HEAD at least.
>>
> Hi,
> Here is updated patch as you suggested in your previous email.
>
> Thanks
>
Hi,
Please take a look at patch v3.
Thanks
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v3-ldap-msg-free.patch | application/octet-stream | 711 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-09-04 13:56:59 | Re: failing to build preproc.c on solaris with sun studio |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2022-09-04 13:46:31 | Re: failing to build preproc.c on solaris with sun studio |