Re: failing to build preproc.c on solaris with sun studio

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: failing to build preproc.c on solaris with sun studio
Date: 2022-09-04 13:56:59
Message-ID: 1723744.1662299819@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 2022-09-02 Fr 13:56, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... However, those aren't arguments against
>> making it optional-to-build like the PLs are.

> That seems reasonable. Note that the buildfarm client would then need an
> extra build step.

Not sure why there'd be an extra build step; I'd envision it more
like "configure ... --with-ecpg" and the main build step either
does it or not. You would need to make the ecpg-check step
conditional, though, so it's moot: we'd have to fix the buildfarm
first in any case, unless it's default-enabled which would seem
a bit odd.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2022-09-04 14:08:34 Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("prev_first_lsn < cur_txn->first_lsn", File: "reorderbuffer.c", Line: 927, PID: 568639)
Previous Message Zhihong Yu 2022-09-04 13:52:37 Re: freeing LDAPMessage in CheckLDAPAuth