From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Subject: | Re: Replication slot stats misgivings |
Date: | 2021-04-16 03:38:06 |
Message-ID: | CALDaNm3yBctNFE6X2FV_haRF4uue9okm1_DVE6ZANWvOV_CvYw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:46 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 1:13 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 3:22 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > Thank you for updating the patch.
> >
> > I have one question on the doc change:
> >
> > + so the counter is not incremented for subtransactions. Note that this
> > + includes the transactions streamed and or spilled.
> > + </para></entry>
> >
> > The patch uses the sentence "streamed and or spilled" in two places.
> > You meant “streamed and spilled”? Even if it actually means “and or”,
> > using "and or” (i.g., connecting “and” to “or” by a space) is general?
> > I could not find we use it other places in the doc but found we're
> > using "and/or" instead.
> >
>
> I changed it to 'and/or' and made another minor change.
I have rebased the remaining patches on top of head. Attached the
patches for the same.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Vignesh
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v13-0001-Use-HTAB-for-replication-slot-statistics.patch | text/x-patch | 31.7 KB |
v13-0002-Test-where-there-are-more-replication-slot-stati.patch | text/x-patch | 2.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2021-04-16 05:11:26 | Re: Retry in pgbench |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2021-04-16 03:32:26 | Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15 |